DDR4 memory is coming soon—maybe too soon | visit |
|
How Amazon saved Zynga's butt—and why Zynga built a cloud of its own | visit |
|
China's restrictive rare earth mineral policy draws global ire | visit |
A recent report from the Congressional Research Office (PDF) suggests that China's restrictive policy on rare earth mineral exports isn't going to change anytime soon. The report comes on the heels of a renewed call for a rare earth production boost in Europe and a dispute settlement filed in March by the United States, Japan, and the European Union with the World Trade Organization over alleged unfair trading practices concerning rare earth minerals. "From 2002 to 2011, the value of US rare earth imports from China rose by 1,376 percent," the CRS report states. "From 2010 to 2011, the value of US rare earth imports from China increased by 305 percent."
For a few years now, there has been a lot of talk about rare earth minerals. You know, the ones that aren’t particularly rare, but are nevertheless crucial for many products. Demand for them has shot up. They’re needed in the production of hybrid cars, missiles, and smartphones. And it doesn’t help that China, the world’s largest producer, announced in 2010 that it was cutting export of its domestic supply. This has since led to newfound attention on mines and processing in California, Estonia, Malaysia, and Australia.
Not surprisingly, the rest of the world isn't very happy at China. The country produces 97 percent of the world's rare earth minerals—according to the United States Geological Survey, that translated to $3.4 billion of the stuff in 2011.
Read the comments on this post

|
Microsoft goes green: data centers, offices to be carbon neutral come July | visit |
|
Judge nixes "Oil Orgy" scheme to scare P2P users into quick settlements | visit |
|
Japan poised to limit gambling-style collecting in social games | visit |
|
Twitter fights government subpoena demanding Occupy Wall Street protester info | visit |
|
New Dell Ubuntu ultrabooks a step in the right direction for Linux support | visit |
|
Seized site's lawyer: US breaking the law by taking domain names | visit |
|
Oracle, Google lawyers spar over Android's Dalvik VM as patent phase begins | visit |
|
Myspace settles with FTC over sharing user data with advertisers | visit |
Myspace has agreed to settle charges that it misled users about sharing their personal information with advertisers, the Federal Trade Commission announced Tuesday. The FTC alleges that Myspace allowed advertisers to combine profile information with browsing information in ways that Myspace's privacy did not cover.
Each Myspace user has an assigned persistent unique identifier, called a "Friend ID," associated with their profile on the site. Even protected profiles contain a certain amount of personal information, such as display name, full name, age, gender, and profile picture (though users had no incentive or obligation from Myspace to make this true to life).
Myspace's privacy policy states that personally identifiable information would not be used in a way inconsistent with the purpose for which it was submitted. The company also says that data used to customize ads would not identify users to third parties, and that it wouldn't share non-anonymized browsing activity.
But in 2009, researchers at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute and AT&T Labs noticed that Myspace was handing the Friend IDs associated with visited pages to advertisers. Advertisers could then associate the browsing data with the users' full names, and associate broader browsing activity with that personal profile. The FTC found this behavior in violation of federal law, and found that as a result of this data sharing, Myspace had lied about its compliance with the US-EU Safe Harbor Framework.
Myspace's settlement is not an admission of guilt, but the company must now establish a "comprehensive privacy program" and submit to third-party audits for the next 20 years. It seems that this won't do much good, as Myspace is already on a significant decline—in short, we'll be surprised if the site lasts that long.
Facebook and Digg were implicated for similar activity at the same time as Myspace, almost exactly two years ago in May 2010. Facebook settled with the FTC on the matter in December 2011, also committing to the 20-year third-party evaluation plan.
Read the comments on this post

|
Facebook "Likejackers" agree to stop sending misleading spam | visit |
|
Mobile (and least-profitable) users spend most time on Facebook | visit |
Facebook users spend more time on the social network on their mobile phones, where monetization and revenue is far weaker than on the desktop site.
According to digital analytics firm comScore, Facebook users on mobile phones—those running iOS, Android and BlackBerry OS—spent 441 minutes per month on the social network during the month of March. This compares with 391 minutes of usage via the traditional desktop site.
That's nearly an extra hour each month—time that advertisers are eager to tap into.
comScore's findings demonstrate just how important the mobile market will be to Facebook's continued success. In the company's February IPO filing, founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitted that "if users increasingly access mobile products as a substitute for access through personal computers, and if we are unable to successfully implement monetization strategies for our mobile users, our financial performance and ability to grow revenue would be negatively affected."
Facebook isn't sitting idly by, however. It acquired mobile photo-sharing app Instagram last month for a whopping $1 billion in cash and company stock, a move viewed largely as an attempt to bolster the company's mobile strategy. Instagram passed 50 million users earlier this month, and is said to be adding an additional 5 million users each week.
In an interview with Bloomberg, Richard Nunn, media analyst at Charles Stanley, said that this so-called "dwell time"—how long users spend on Facebook each month—is a "big factor for advertisers, and therefore, revenue." Last year, the company introduced sponsored posts into users' mobile news feeds, but Nunn believes it is only a matter of time before users see full-fledged advertising too.
Read the comments on this post

|
Mobile users spend most time on Facebook—where it makes the least money | visit |
Facebook users spend more time on the social network on their mobile phones, where monetization and revenue is far weaker than on the desktop site.
According to digital analytics firm comScore, Facebook users on mobile phones—those running iOS, Android and BlackBerry OS—spent 441 minutes per month on the social network during the month of March. This compares with 391 minutes of usage via the traditional desktop site.
That's nearly an extra hour each month—time that advertisers are eager to tap into.
comScore's findings demonstrate just how important the mobile market will be to Facebook's continued success. In the company's February IPO filing, founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitted that "if users increasingly access mobile products as a substitute for access through personal computers, and if we are unable to successfully implement monetization strategies for our mobile users, our financial performance and ability to grow revenue would be negatively affected."
Facebook isn't sitting idly by, however. It acquired mobile photo-sharing app Instagram last month for a whopping $1 billion in cash and company stock, a move viewed largely as an attempt to bolster the company's mobile strategy. Instagram passed 50 million users earlier this month, and is said to be adding an additional 5 million users each week.
In an interview with Bloomberg, Richard Nunn, media analyst at Charles Stanley, said that this so-called "dwell time"—how long users spend on Facebook each month—is a "big factor for advertisers, and therefore, revenue." Last year, the company introduced sponsored posts into users' mobile news feeds, but Nunn believes it is only a matter of time before users see full-fledged advertising too.
Read the comments on this post

|
Feature: Coolest jobs in tech: from the pits of Le Mans to the dugouts of Fenway Park | visit |
|
Apple, Samsung cut some patent claims to keep July 30 trial date in US | visit |
Apple and Samsung have both filed motions offering to cut the number of asserted patent claims in half. The purpose of cutting the claims was to keep a proposed July 30 trial date for the companies' first US lawsuit over their mobile device patent disputes. Apple continues to contend that Samsung is a "copycat," while Samsung claims Apple is merely trying to "compete through litigation."
Judge Lucy Koh told both companies during a recent case management meeting that the number of asserted claims was far too large, suggesting that forcing a jury to wade through them all would be akin to cruel and unusual punishment. Koh said the number of claims would have to be reduced significantly in order to proceed with a proposed July 30 start date for the trial.
While Apple and Samsung filed a joint motion to reduce claims last Tuesday, neither party seemed willing to budge very much. However, the separate motions filed this week cut the number of asserted patents and other rights nearly in half. Apple cut out four of eight asserted patents against Samsung, three of seven asserted design patents, and four of nine trade dress claims. It also dropped all of its asserted trademark claims.
Samsung has cut its asserted patents from 12 to 7, though many of the remaining patents are deemed "essential" to wireless 3G standards. Continued assertion of those patents against Apple could constitute abuse of its agreement to license such patents on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. The company is under a formal investigation by the European Commission for such alleged abuse.
It originally appeared that Apple may have been more interested in a broad and decisive win against Samsung rather than a quick resolution of the case. However, its proposal filed on Monday suggested that Samsung's continued infringement is costing Apple billions in sales while Samsung continues to gain market share lead over Apple.
The two companies are preparing for a court-recommended mediation later this month. While Apple CEO Tim Cook has expressed an interest in settling the dispute out of court, he said that he didn't want Apple to become "the developer to the world."
"I've always hated litigation and I continue to hate it," Cook said during Apple's most recent financial results announcement, but "we just want people to invent their own stuff."
Read the comments on this post

|
iOS 5.1.1 patches URL spoofing flaw, two other security vulnerabilities | visit |
The iOS 5.1.1 update released on Monday doesn't just fix a handful of feature bugs—it also patches a security flaw that allowed an attacker to display the URL of one site in Mobile Safari while loading another, potentially tricking users into visiting malicious sites.
MajorSecurity researcher David Vieira-Kurz demonstrated a proof of concept for the flaw in March of this year, which caused a new window to open when clicking a specially crafted link. The new window showed the user that it was loading (for example) Apple's website, but actually loads another page that gave the appearance of loading Apple's site via an iframe. Vieira-Kurz said the vulnerability was related to the way Mobile Safari handles JavaScript's window.open() function, which could be used to trick users into handing passwords or credit card information over to attackers.
The flaw was present in iOS 5.0, 5.0.1, and 5.1, but is fixed in 5.1.1, as highlighted by Kaspersky Lab's ThreatPost blog. In addition to a fix for the URL spoofing flaw, iOS 5.1.1 also patches a vulnerability used by researcher Sergey Glazunov at CanSecWest this year, which could lead to a cross-site scripting attack, as well as one submitted by Adam Barth and Abhishek Arya of the Google Chrome Security Team that could lead to arbitrary code executions.
Read the comments on this post

|
AT&T ready to board the shared data plan train | visit |
AT&T has started to embrace the idea of shared family data plans, Ralph de la Vega, President and CEO of AT&T Mobility, told CNET on Tuesday. With this new interest, the company is playing catch-up with Verizon, which announced its interest in family data plans last year.
De la Vega had previously been less than enthusiastic about shared data plans, saying that it would be tricky to support the feature in customer service while making sure the company could still turn a profit on it. It appears the company has worked out those kinks for the most part and is well on its way to rolling out the shared plans. "I'm very comfortable with the plan that will be offered to our customers," de la Vega told CNET at the CTIA trade show in New Orleans. De la Vega did not speak to the timing of the rollout, pricing, or any other further details.
Verizon announced in May 2011 that it felt a future with family data plans was inevitable. "I think it's safe to assume that at some point you are going to have megaplans and people are going to share that megaplan based on the number of devices within their family. That's just a logical progression," said Fran Shammo, Verizon's CFO.
A leak by Engadget in January showed that Verizon intends to charge for one communal pool of data to be shared among family plan members, with an additional $10 access charge for each device. Obviously, Verizon was, and is, in no hurry to get the shared plans out to customers, but a newly competitive AT&T may light a fire under its cell towers. T-Mobile has thus far remained mum on the issue of shared data, but Sprint does currently offer a shared family data plan starting at $129.99 a month (Sprint is also the only remaining carrier with any kind of unlimited data plan).
Neither company has directly addressed the issue of sharing data service with non-voice devices that customers must buy separate data plans for, such as tablets. We have our fingers crossed that our iPads, Galaxy Tabs, and Xooms will somehow be involved.
Read the comments on this post

|
Belching dinosaurs may have helped keep their world a hot one | visit |
|
Passpoint WiFi tech promises cellphone-like handoff between hotspots | visit |
|
Feature: Government asks: when can we shut down wireless service? | visit |
|
EA: The Old Republic has lost nearly 25% of its subscribers since March | visit |
|
Google gets license to test drive autonomous cars on Nevada roads | visit |
|
Attackers target unpatched PHP bug allowing malicious code execution (Updated) | visit |
|
Anti-climate science group "experiments" with billboard trolling | visit |
Prior to this spring, the Heartland Institute was a relatively obscure think tank that was primarily known for organizing an annual conference of people who take issue with mainstream climate science. That changed when an environmental researcher tricked the group into sending him internal documents, setting off a public drama that ended up leaving both parties worse off (Heartland lost sponsors, while the researcher had to resign a number of his positions).
Apparently, the experience left Heartland craving more public controversy, and it responded with what can best be described as a bit of trolling. In advance of this year's climate-skeptic conference, Heartland paid for a billboard that showed a picture of the Unabomber accompanied by the text "I still believe in Global Warming. Do You?" In a press release, Heartland said future iterations would feature Charles Manson, Fidel Castro, and possibly Osama bin Laden.
Instead, the campaign was stopped after 24 hours as prominent conference speakers threatened to cancel and a number of the Institute's financial backers threatened to depart.
Read the comments on this post

|
OS X plain text password flaw has been around for 3 months and counting | visit |
|
Subsidized Xbox 360: bad deal for consumers, missed opportunity for Microsoft | visit |
|
Kim Dotcom lampoons New Zealand MP in his new rap song | visit |
Say what you will about Kim Dotcom, but if there’s something that we (and the Feds) can probably agree on, it’s that he’s entertaining. After all, what other target of an international manhunt, while under investigation, comes out with a catchy rap tune as part of a New Zealand political scandal?
On Sunday, the Megaupload magnate, who had his assets seized and site smashed earlier this year, released the "John Banks Song" on YouTube.
 The new track was produced with the Black Eyed Peas' Printz Board.
Its chorus crows: "Nothing to fear / Nothing to hide / He's the majority / So he's all right. / He is John Banks / He got the vote / And that's why Key keeps him afloat / On his cabbage boat."
John Banks is the head of the ACT New Zealand political party and the current minister for Small Business and Regulatory Reform. Kim Dotcom is alleged to have donated NZ$50,000 ($38,000) to the 2010 Banks campaign for mayor of the city of Auckland, keeping it anonymous and under the radar by splitting it in two. Dotcom is now set to be questioned by local authorities over this issue.
Banks has said previously that he "didn’t come up the river in a cabbage boat." This appears to be a New Zealand English expression meaning that he’s not stupid. Prime Minister John Key is a governing coalition with Banks’ ACT party, and has publicly defended Banks.
Banks, however, has subsequently denied that he broke any elections laws, and then said that he could not remember if he’d taken a helicopter ride to Dotcom’s mansion to meet with him.
"He took that strategy to a level of absurdity," said Bryce Edwards, an Otago University political scientist, in an interview with the New Zealand Herald over the weekend. "People don't understand the whole case but they pick up on things like the helicopter. People just think the whole thing stinks."
The newspaper also reported that his poll numbers had dropped to just 10 percent in the wake of the political scandal, and reported last week that the "Crown lawyers acting for the United States knew before seizing Kim Dotcom's fortune and property that they were using an unlawful court order."
On Monday, the paper, which has been filling inquiries through the Official Information Act, also reported that "police officers who raided the mansion of Internet magnate Kim Dotcom put together a list of belongings for United States authorities to seize."
Last Friday, Prime Minister John Key denied any knowledge of Dotcom "until the day before the raids even though his senior ministers, a string of senior civil servants, and his own electorate staff were involved in matters relating to him. It has emerged that staff in the Prime Minister's own department were aware of Dotcom and his bid through the Overseas Investment Office to buy the mansion in which he lived with his family."
Read the comments on this post

|
Google guilty of infringement in Oracle trial; future legal headaches loom | visit |
|
Sen. Al Franken to FCC: Still unhappy about Comcast-NBC merger | visit |
Another year, another complaint from Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) against Comcast and its merger with NBC Universal that was approved last year. Just as he did before, the senator—now in a letter published publicly on Monday (PDF)—is "urging [the Federal Communications Commission and the United States Department of Justice] to proactively monitor, investigate, and enforce the conditions you adopted in the merger order."
As the Minnesota senator has outlined previously, he " hates the merger." In this letter he notes that "a number of complaints regarding Comcast's compliance with the merger conditions
have languished" before the FCC.
In an e-mail sent to Ars, Comcast denied any wrongdoing.
"Comcast and NBCUniversal are fully complying with (indeed exceeding) the transaction orders as detailed in our recently filed Annual Compliance Report," wrote Sena Fitzmaurice, a Comcast spokesperson.
Specifically, Franken notes that it took the FCC 10 months to deal with a dispute involving the Bloomberg news channel, and Comcast’s refusal to put it in the same "neighborhood" as other similar channels. (The FCC ruled in Bloomberg’s favor last week). Franken also noted that a similar conflict with the Tennis Channel is also pending.
"The one complaint by an outside party regarding the NBCUniversal FCC Order has been brought by another very large media company, Bloomberg LLP - and it has been preliminarily adjudicated," Fitzmaurice added. "We respectfully disagree with the Media Bureau’s interpretation believe the full Commission will agree on appeal to enforce conditions as they were originally negotiated and intended."
Franken took the FCC to task too, noting that "at least one online video distributor (OVD) has encountered problems negotiating programming deals with Comcast." This resulted in Comcast arguing that it needs a "full, unredacted copy of the underlying peer agreement before it can provide its programming." CBS, News Corporation, Sony Pictures, Time Warner, Viacom, and Disney argued earlier this year (in their own letter to the FCC) this was "overbroad and will harm competition
[as it would allow] one entity to possess detailed nonpublic information about its competitors' business dealings—which would appear to be counter to relevant competition laws."
Franken concludes: "I am concerned that these sorts of delays always inure to the benefit of Comcast and give Comcast further incentive to challenge any aspect of its compliance with the merger order." He's also "very concerned" about Comcast’s announcement last month that its Xbox Live television streaming would not count against existing data caps. Comcast argues the video is "being delivered over our private IP network and not the public Internet."
However, Comcast spokesperson Sena Fitzmaurice added that the On Demand service, is "indisputably part of our Title VI cable service which is not subject to the FCC's Open Internet Rules - and we are not aware of anyone who has taken a contrary view."
But Senator Franken does appear to have a differing opinion.
"I am not yet prepared to say that this appears to be a technical violation of the Commission's merger order or DOJ's final judgment, but I urge both of your agencies to investigate this conduct immediately," Franken wrote. "Even if this does not amount to a technical violation, it certainly raises serious questions about how Comcast will favor its own content and services to the detriment of its competitors."
Read the comments on this post

|
Apple improves AirPlay playback, iPad network switching, HDR with iOS 5.1.1 | visit |
|
Free 20GB cloud storage for MobileMe subscribers extended to Sept. 30 | visit |
MobileMe users who transition their accounts to iCloud will be able to keep their free 20GB of extra storage for an additional three months after MobileMe's shutdown, according to Apple. The company has updated its FAQ page on the MobileMe-to-iCloud transition (hat tip to MacOtakara), explaining that MobileMe users who want complimentary iCloud storage upgrades will be able to take advantage of the upgrade through September 30, 2012. That deadline has been moved back from June 30, when MobileMe shuts down, most likely in an attempt to lure more users into transitioning their accounts instead of letting them die.
When Apple introduced iCloud in October of 2011 along with iOS 5 and the iPhone 4S, the company explained that the cloud service was meant to replace MobileMe—itself a successor of Apple's old iTools service launched in the year 2000. iCloud's services are somewhat similar to those offered through MobileMe; users who transition their accounts to iCloud can still use their MobileMe e-mail accounts, Back To My Mac, and Find My iPhone, but will also gain a handful of new services, like Find My Mac, iTunes in the Cloud, Photo Stream, and document syncing services over iOS devices.
MobileMe users will also lose a few services when they transition. As noted by Apple last year, iWeb publishing, iDisk storage and file sharing, and MobileMe's photo/video gallery feature will all only exist until MobileMe is shut down in June of this year. Apple was quick to give some benefits to its paid MobileMe subscribers, though, offering them 20GB extra cloud storage for free when they migrate their accounts to iCloud—normal users signing up for a new iCloud account receive 5GB of free storage automatically.
With the free storage expiration date extended for another three months after MobileMe goes dark, we're willing to guess that Apple hasn't yet seen as many MobileMe accounts transition to iCloud as it would like. It's possible that some MobileMe users are aware of the June 30 deadline but are planning to just let their accounts expire along with it. The extension to September could mean more MobileMe customers making the jump after all and giving iCloud a try, though the rest of MobileMe's services will still be going away in June.
Read the comments on this post

|
A near-future prognosis for television: surprisingly strong, driven by more control | visit |
|
Google+ Hangouts on Air live broadcasting is now out of beta | visit |
Google+ users can now broadcast live public video feeds and video conferences via webcams through its Hangouts on Air feature, which was previously only available to a select number of accounts. Google announced today that Hangouts on Air is now out of beta and will be rolled out to all of its users worldwide.
Google implemented videoconferencing via its Hangouts feature when it released Google+, though at the time the broadcasting was limited to those users who were joining in the video conference (there’s a limit to 10 per session). Hangouts on Air now lets users broadcast their own version of a television channel publicly. The application provides similar functionality to competing services such as UStream, Livestream, and Justin.tv by opening video webcam streams for public viewing. In Hangouts on Air, anyone can watch a video session. Google+ is also encouraging users to browse and casually join these hangouts via Google+’s revamped hangouts page, where users can find sessions that are currently taking place. Live broadcasts are automatically recorded to the host user’s YouTube channel for later viewing or embedding. Users can also embed their live broadcasts on other websites, effectively expanding the reach of the Google+ platform beyond registered users of its service.
Hangouts on Air does require users to enable the new feature, and they must also review and agree to its terms of service. Doing so will also link the user’s Google+ account to their YouTube channel. In some cases, users may also need to upgrade Google’s voice and video plugin for Web browsers. Google says the feature is rolling out to users starting today, so it may take some time to see it enabled in users’ individual accounts.
Read the comments on this post

|
LA smog: more cows than cars? | visit |
|
DocTrackr offers file tracking, analytics, without the paranoia | visit |
In the physical world, when you share a record or a book with a friend, it's still technically yours. But in the digital world, where documents aren't so much shared as they are copied, it's difficult for content creators to maintain control.
Sharing a Word document chock-full of sensitive information isn't like lending out your beloved old copy of Paul's Boutique, after all. You can forward that document to multiple people, edit its contents, and print out as many copies as you want. And in most cases, the content creator is likely none the wiser. Clément Cazalot believed there had to be a better—and easier—way to keep such crucial documents in check.
Rather than create a paranoid tool for paranoid people, Cazalot and his cofounder Alex Negrea created DocTrackr, a file tracking service that also gathers usage analytics. The service tracks how and where documents are being viewed and shared—and boasts a handy kill switch to revoke access altogether, if needed—with the hopes of giving creators a better idea of how their content is being used.
Read the comments on this post

|
Future U: Classroom tech doesn't mean handing out tablets | visit |
|
Feature: Game over—how sanctions and violence doomed Syria's gaming industry | visit |
|
Feature: Future U: Classroom tech doesn't mean handing out tablets | visit |
|
Hands-on: testing the GIMP 2.8 and its new single-window interface | visit |
|
Exercises in democracy: building a digital public library | visit |
|
Schools can't stop wondering what students are up to on Facebook | visit |
|
Not-Horrible iPad Cases: a round-up of the best | visit |
The following round-up is from our esteemed colleagues at The Wirecutter. We recently were discussing this very topic in the Editor's household, where children abound and the SmartCover fails to do much protecting.
Some people think the iPad is so gorgeous it doesn't need a case. I disagree, and my favorite overall case is Joy Factory's SmartSuit 3.
I'm surprised we could narrow it down; this took some doing. After about 70 hours of trolling published reviews and surveys of every case available for the new iPad, we called in roughly a dozen finalists to check the fit and feel ourselves. We eliminated the obviously ugly, cheap-feeling, poor-fitting, ill-reviewed cases in previous iPad 2 iterations, and selected the most protective, ergonomic and aesthetically pleasing models available. We looked at every model from makers like Speck, Targus, XtremeMac, G-Form, Switcheasy, Marware, DODOcase, Grovemade.
(An up-front tip of the hat to iLounge's Nick Guy is in order here, because he is clearly the best iPad case reviewer around. We gained a lot, not only from his insights but from the sheer number of cases reviewed. His work represents as complete a catalog as you'll find.)
Read the comments on this post

|
EPA, Department of the Interior announce additional fracking oversight | visit |
Drafts of new regulations relating to hydraulic fracturing in natural gas production were released for public comment Friday. This follows on the heels of the new rules for air emissions released two weeks ago. The US Environmental Protection Agency announced new guidance for obtaining permits when diesel fuel is included as a component of the fracking fluid used to fracture source rocks and free the gas trapped inside. As we laid out in a previous story, a 2005 amendment to the Safe Drinking Water Act exempted fracking from regulation as an underground injection, except when diesel fuel is used. Despite that caveat, the industry continued using diesel fuel without reporting it, saying that the EPA had never explicitly provided a process for them to do so. That process is now laid out in the new guidance. This may become a moot point, however, as public pressure is forcing the industry to move to more innocuous alternatives.
The US Department of the Interior also announced new rules for fracking on federal and Indian land, greatly increasing oversight. Fracking must now be explicitly approved as part of the normal drilling permits companies apply for when operating on federal land. This will require them to submit details on the layers of rock they plan to frack and how they will manage and dispose of the spent fracking fluids. They will also have to submit documentation of tests performed to ensure integrity of the seal around the well before the actual fracking begins. After the process is complete, drillers will have to publicly disclose the chemicals used in the fracking fluid.
In the press release, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar says, “As we continue to offer millions of acres of America’s public lands for oil and gas development, it is critical that the public have full confidence that the right safety and environmental protections are in place. The proposed rule will modernize our management of well stimulation activities—including hydraulic fracturing—to make sure that fracturing operations conducted on public and Indian lands follow common-sense industry best practices.”
Several states (most notably Wyoming and Texas) already have some similar requirements on the books, and others may use the federal rules as a template in the future. The drafts of both the EPA guidance and DOI rules will be revised and finalized following the 60 day public comment period.
Read the comments on this post

|
Leave only footprints: how Google's ethical ignorance gets it in trouble | visit |
|
Has the Mac crested? The OpenForum's haikus tackle the issue | visit |
|
Disney researchers put gesture recognition in door knobs, chairs, fish tanks | visit |
|
When Google alone doesn't cut it: help us tackle tough sync scenarios | visit |
|
A trip to the (virtual) grocery store | visit |
|
Weird Science increases its fondness for atheists | visit |
I thought I didn't like you, but then you mentioned the Supreme Court: Atheists are some of the least trusted members of society, consistently coming in last in polls that ask whether you'd vote for a hypothetical presidential candidate that had certain features. Now, researchers have figured out a way to make atheists a touch more appealing: prime people with thoughts of trusted secular authorities. This didn't eliminate the bias against atheists, but it did seem to reduce it a bit.
Buckyballs as a fabricated fountain of youth: The fullerenes are spherical cages of carbon atoms, the most common containing 60 of them. Their distinctive chemical properties have led to their use for a variety of materials, including a number in which they'll end up in contact with the human body—in a few cases, ingested as drugs. Various studies have shown that fullerenes are nontoxic when the exposure is brief, so one lab decided to give some rats a repeated dose of the fullerene and see what happens. Surprisingly, they report, the rats lived twice as long as their control peers, even though the fullerene was cleared within a couple of days.
That result may be weird, but there's something else fishy about the experiments. Derek Lowe, who first blogged about the results, saw his eagle-eyed readers dive into the paper, and come up with a bit of a problem. Two figures, meant to represent different data, actually turned out to be different views of the same sample. This could be an innocuous mistake but, as Lowe notes, it doesn't exactly give you confidence in the paper. So, best not to fry up your pork chops with buckyballs just yet.
Studying the past using a giant tower of bird poop: This is a way to reconstruct that past that only a faculty member with some expendable grad students would love: a large, unused tower that had been occupied by chimney swifts for decades, recording their history through the equivalent of sedimentary layers at the bottom. Except the sediment is bird poop. The authors could track the arrival of DDT and the changes it created in the insect populations eaten by the swifts using that 50-year record.
Maybe we should see how yeast respond to Viagra, too: Zoloft is an antidepressant that targets a signaling pathway used by nerve cells. Yeast have no nerve cells (more accurately, yeast are single cells that don't happen to be nerves). Yet, dump Zoloft on yeast, and it triggers significant changes, probably through altering the internal membranes of the yeast. All of which has some pretty serious implications, since the drug may be doing similar things in humans.
Read the comments on this post

|